12 Replies
Last post:
Feb 21, 2005 1:03 PM by
"Christoffer \"Kreiger\" Hammarström
"
Robert S. Sfeir
How about also removing the spam? It's rather annoying to look at.
How about not including 20 lines of pgp sigs for one line's worth of
comments 
(I was chided for it before, and now see how bad it is)
R
"Christoffer \"Kreiger\" Hammarström
"
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
>>How about also removing the spam? It's rather annoying to look at.
>
>
How about not including 20 lines of pgp sigs for one line's worth of
comments
>
R
I never see or think about those signatures, since my mail reader (enigmail in mozilla mail) filters them out and instead tells me
"Good signature from ...".
In the future hopefully everybody will sign their messages, and all mail readers will support this.
I'll test using PGP/MIME instead. Does this message look any better?
/Kreiger
Yup, that's much better
It's worth saying that the enormous SIG showed up in the web version of the interface too, so the PGP/MIME is much nicer...
Robert S. Sfeir
Are you saying that your news reader ("MT-NewsWatcher/3.4"?) is rendering an
attachment with mime-type application/pgp-signature,
inline as text/plain? (Perhaps you can "view source" or its equivalent to
verify this?)
yes
If so, it sounds like a bug.
don't really care
R
"Christoffer \"Kreiger\" Hammarström
"
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
>
don't really care
>
Of course, i just meant that perhaps you'd might want to report it to the developers.
/Kreiger